Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - AKA_Greywolf

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 15
166
General Discussion / Very Cool Commercial, I think I want one.
« on: November 03, 2016, 06:33:21 pm »

167
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 / Re: Before I begin on Italy, your thoughts on...
« on: November 03, 2016, 05:34:03 pm »
Gos can you turn on the skins on our practice maps?

168
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 / Re: Italy Campaign
« on: November 03, 2016, 05:32:56 pm »
I know TOAD is a friend of Thrud, not sure if anyone offered him a spot on the AI side. I know he is recovering from a broken foot, so he wasn't able to fly with our side much this last campaign.

Also anyone have an idea when or if Rel can get an Italy practice map on the server so guys can start getting familiar with the map?

169
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 / Re: Before I begin on Italy, your thoughts on...
« on: November 02, 2016, 05:53:30 pm »
Rel,

Couple of thoughts regarding the upcoming Italy campaign.

1. Would it possible to experiment with turning on the skins downloads to see if the server can deal with the extra graphics? I know we talked about it before and I think Gos was going to look into it.

2. Any way to test out the server with the latest additions for IL2 regarding Bomb and Fuze delays?

3. Thoughts about adding paratroopers to make capture attaempts of enemy bases? How would that work for the AI side?

Just some thoughts.


170
General Discussion / I may have found our XO Taipans hidden secret
« on: September 30, 2016, 09:56:02 am »
This may explain his odd penchant for animals (sheep, goats, cats and rats!), anyone else notice the resemblance to the "Coach" character in this newly discovered historic documentary. I think this guy might have been Taipan's long lost old mentor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmHRx3211OE






171
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 / Re: Burma 1944/45 Campaign
« on: August 25, 2016, 08:52:03 am »
Rel, I know I can't make the 28th at all so a short break would be nice. As for restarting on either the Sept 2nd or Sept 4th either would work for me. However I think Labor Day also falls on that weekend here in the states. Not sure if people have any travel plans for that weekend, but for some people that weekend people usually take their last end summer fling short trip or family picnics. At least a lot of people do here in the midwest US.

That may have some impact on peoples attendence to a campaign mission. Just saying keep that in mind, so re-starting on the following Friday - Sept. 9th may also be something you may want to consider.

172
General Discussion / Anybody in the squad play Fantasy Football?
« on: August 23, 2016, 07:18:48 pm »
Just wondering??  I have been playing for years now and never asked any other squad mates if they play.

If there would be any interest in starting up a AKA League. With the NFL season about to start this would be a good time to set one up.

173
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 / Re: Burma '44 - post 7/22 mission fixes
« on: July 23, 2016, 10:24:42 pm »
Thanks Rel, I'll remind my guys about the aircraft spawn issue at Rangoon during our next mission at our pre-flight briefing.

S! Grey

174
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 / Re: Burma 1944/45 Campaign
« on: July 06, 2016, 12:57:36 pm »
6-6:30 Pacific should be fine. Ill pop on TS tonite. Regarding a poll that would be fine also. Perhaps we can take a quick poll before flying on Friday.

175
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 / Re: Burma 1944/45 Campaign
« on: July 05, 2016, 08:05:29 pm »
Also Rel, forgot to ask .... I know we had the mini map turned on in the practice server, are we going to turn it on for this campaign. We never really said officially yet. we only said we were going to turn it on in the practice server to see if you could get it to work. So what is the decision?

176
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 / Re: Burma 1944/45 Campaign
« on: July 05, 2016, 08:01:31 pm »
Sorry Rel, had to take the wife to a Dr. appt Tuesday evening. I should be up on Wed evening though.

177
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 / Re: Burma 1944/45 Campaign
« on: June 30, 2016, 08:39:18 am »
Rel,

I was in the map under the commanders view to make changes for the axis prior to this Fridays practice mission. I have a few questions/concerns about bridges. There is a debrief view available, so I saw some of the information from the last practice mission. One thing I noticed was multiple notes on Road System failures or Bridge Down failures. There had to be 27-28 of them in all. Regarding Bridges, I have noticed a number of areas where there are no viewable bridges. You just see the road, then the river then the road again on the other side of the river. Will ground units be able to cross over these rivers. Are we going to see instances of trucks and tanks just sitting in rivers? If so let me know so I can inform my guys.

178
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 / Re: Burma 1944/45 Campaign
« on: June 14, 2016, 09:47:20 am »
Rel, I know your still working on some of the airfields on the Burma map for our upcoming campaign. Can I ask why you put one of the Seaplane bases near Rangoon. That particular Seaplane base is somewhat useless for the Japanese side as it very small and narrow for manuevering the larger H8K1 Flying Boats.

Both of the Allied seaplane bases are more situated towards open ocean and along the coastline. Was that particular base historically accurate and required. If not, can that Japanese seaplane base be relocated?

Maybe near the AW-14 stop or just south of that along the coast, or even further south near the mouths of the rivers at BB-6 or BC-6.

Just asking because as I mentioned the current location of that particular seaplane base is going to almost make that base useless to us.

179
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 / Re: Burma 1944/45 Campaign
« on: June 13, 2016, 06:18:44 pm »
OK Rel,

Here's what I found at each of the blue bases. I will ask that any of the other blue pilots chime in on this and give your opinions on the runway conditions at each of these bases also.

1.) BK-30 Toungoo: BOTH Take Off and Landings were both smooth. I think it's good to go.

2.) BE-25 Zigon: BOTH Take Off and Landings were a little rough, with some bouncy conditions especially on landing. A number of Blue pilots have had issues with nose-overs. Mostly on landings.

3.) BM-22 Pyuntaza: BOTH Take Off and Landings were really rough, definitely will need work on this one!

4.) AZ-14 Bassein: BOTH Take Off and Landings were both smooth. I think it's good to go.

5.) BI-14 Rangoon: Big Airbase, 3 Runways! BOTH Take Off and Landings at each of the three runways were smooth. I think it's good to go.

6.) BT-10 Moulmein: The BLUE SUPPLY BASE. BOTH Take Off and Landings were really rough, definitely we will need work on this one!

I have not checked out the SeaPlane bases for conditions there. But those bases listed above are what I have found conditions at so far. I would say Pyuntaza and Moulmein for sure are going to need work. The base at Zigon, it's rough on take off but it's doable. The landings there are going to be the big problem. My opinion is to just go ahead and fix that one too. So three bases on the blue side should be verified by other people to validate my findings.

TTYL

180
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 / Re: Burma 1944/45 Campaign
« on: June 13, 2016, 03:04:51 pm »
Thanks Rel,

I will pop on tonite and try to give you a update on all the blue bases.

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 15